On Air Now:
Now Playing:Loading...
site loader
March 14, 2022 SERAP Sues Buhari Over ‘Security Agencies’ Access To Subscribers’ Details’ Via Nin-Sim Linkage

SERAP Sues Buhari Over ‘Security Agencies’ Access To Subscribers’ Details’ Via Nin-Sim Linkage

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has sued President Muhammadu Buhari for failing to rescind his “approval” for security agencies to access people’s details via NIN-SIM linkage without due process of law.

The agencies were reportedly granted access to the database of the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC).

The suit FHC/L/CS/448/2022 was filed Friday at the Federal High Court in Lagos by Kolawole Oluwadare and Opeyemi Owolabi.

SERAP is asking the court to determine whether the approval is consistent with the principles of legality and necessity.

The applicants are requesting an order setting it aside due to “violations of private and digital communication rights, right to family life, human dignity and personal liberty”.

They want an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Federal Government, any other authority or group of persons from access to NIN-SIM details.

The organization said millions of law-abiding Nigerians may feel that their private lives are the subject of constant surveillance.

SERAP argues that in a digital age, protecting the right to privacy requires exceptional attention and that interference with the right to privacy is not permissible.

The suit insists individuals should freely receive and share information of a personal nature without interference from the authorities.

SERAP noted that access to people’s personal details would contravene section 37 of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 (as amended), article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The other is article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which protect against arbitrary or unlawful interference with one’s privacy.”

“The power to access individual’s details raises serious concerns as to their arbitrary use by the authorities responsible for applying them”, the suit reads.

The Respondents are Abubakar Malami (SAN) Attorney General and Minister of Justice, and Isa Ali Pantami, Minister of Communications and Digital Economy.

No date has been fixed for hearing of the suit.

MORE STORIES

 

 

November 22, 2021 SERAP Slams President Buhari With Lawsuit Over Non-Disclosure Of N6trn NDDC Fund Looters

SERAP Slams President Buhari With Lawsuit Over Non-Disclosure Of N6trn NDDC Fund Looters

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against President Muhammadu Buhari over alleged financial misappropriation within the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).

This was contained in a lawsuit filed by SERAP lawyers Kolawole Oluwadare and Opeyemi Owolabi, at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

According to the Organisation, this suit is due to the failure of President BUHARI “to publish the names of those indicted in the alleged misappropriation of over N6 trillion in the running of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) between 2000 and 2019, as documented in the recent Forensic Audit Report on NDDC.

SERAP also sought “an order of mandamus to direct and compel President BUHARI to publish the names of those indicted in the alleged misappropriation of over N6trn in the running of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) between 2000 and 2019.

The suit, which has been assigned to Justice Binta Nyako at Court 2, is fixed for hearing on 29th November 2021.

 

July 2, 2021 Abubakar Malami Absence Stalls SERAP’s Suit On Abacha Loot

Abubakar Malami Absence Stalls SERAP’s Suit On Abacha Loot

The case instituted by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project against the Federal Government over recovered ABACHA's loot, suffers setback at the Federal High Court Abuja, due to the absence of the Minister of Justice, ABUBAKAR MALAMI.

Justice TAIWO TAIWO adjourned the matter to July 27 and issued a hearing notice to be served on the AGF.

SERAP had sued the Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, ZAINAB AHMED, and the AGF as first and second defendants respectively.

In the suit, SERAP prayed the court to compel the Federal Government to disclose the exact amount recovered from ABACHA's loot and also the details of projects executed with the recovered loot.

SERAP's lawyer, OPEYEMI OWOLABI, informed the court that he had a motion on notice seeking to apply for an order of mandamus against the defendants.

He told the court that he had earlier brought the motion ex parte but was directed by the court to put all the parties on notice.

June 23, 2021 You Lack Jurisdiction To Criminalize Twitter Suspension- FG tells ECOWAS Court

You Lack Jurisdiction To Criminalize Twitter Suspension- FG tells ECOWAS Court

The federal government has told the ECOWAS court that it lacked the jurisdiction to criminalize the suspension of Twitter in Nigeria as the suspension of the operations of Twitter in Nigeria is not a right recognized under any treaty enforceable by the ECOWAS court. 

The Federal government stated this in a preliminary objection filed to challenge the suit by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and 176 concerned Nigerians over its directive to prosecute those violating the suspension.

The Federal government argued that the court lacks the jurisdiction to “determine the criminalization of an act under Nigerian laws”. It said Twitter is a microblogging site, and not “an organization of any member state”.

Part of the Federal government's objection reads

“The right to freedom of expression is completely different from freedom of reach. The suspension of Twitter does not fall under the provisions of arts 8 and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The suspension of Twitter in Nigeria is not a right recognized under any treaty enforceable by this Court.

In the unlikely event that this Honourable Court agrees with SERAP that the suspension of Twitter is a fundamental right, the dissolution or liquidation of twitter as a profit-making entity may as well open a floodgate and vest the users the rights of a non-existent right.

Twitter is a profit-making entity which can be proscribed/dissolved in compliance with any national laws. The compulsory shut down of an entity cannot be termed the breach of any fundamental rights by this Honourable Court.

The suspension of Twitter in Nigeria is in compliance with the provisions of sections 420, 419 of the Penal Code [Northern Nigeria]; Federal Provisions Act, and section 58 of the Criminal Code Act. The operation of Twitter is in violation of Nigerian domestic legislation.

Ground Two: This Court lacks the jurisdiction to determine the criminalization of an act under Nigerian laws.

The subject matter of the SERAP suit borders on the criminalization of Twitter operation in Nigeria pursuant to the Penal Code and the Criminal Code. The use and operation of Twitter in Nigeria constitutes the offences of Importation of Prohibited publication under sections 420 and 421 or the offence of possession of seditious articles under section 419 of the Penal Code Federal Provisions Act.

In any event there is a right of action vested in the suspension of Twitter in Nigeria, the said right vests directly on Twitter and not individual users of Twitter. This is more so that individual user’s Twitter accounts were not tempered but only the operation of Twitter.”

The government said “Nigerians and SERAP have no cause of action,” adding that the suspension of Twitter is backed by provisions of the Company and Allied Matters Act, 2020.

Watch Live

x
PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com
X