On Air Now:
Now Playing:Loading...
site loader
October 4, 2024 Falana Dismisses VDM’s Allegations as ‘Infantile Radicalism,’ Demands Apology

Falana Dismisses VDM’s Allegations as ‘Infantile Radicalism,’ Demands Apology

Human rights lawyer Femi Falana has dismissed allegations made against him by blogger VeryDarkMan, describing them as "infantile radicalism." The blogger, whose real name is Martins Otse, had circulated a voice note in which popular crossdresser Idris Okuneye, also known as Bobrisky, claimed to have paid ₦15 million to officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to drop money laundering charges. In the same voice note, Bobrisky allegedly stated that Falana had sought a presidential pardon for him in exchange for ₦10 million.

Falana categorically denied the claims and demanded an apology from VeryDarkMan, stating that the accusations were baseless and defamatory. "Infantile radicalism. Some young people today do not consider the legal implications of defamation. They simply go out to embarrass others," he said during a monitored program on Thursday.

The lawyer clarified that while he would not pursue criminal charges, he planned to take civil action to defend his reputation and that of his son, Folarin (Falz). "We are not filing a criminal complaint. Instead, we will initiate civil proceedings to restore our integrity. We are asking for a retraction and an apology, and if we don’t receive it, we will go to the High Court," Falana explained.

He also stated that he had no personal contact with Bobrisky. "I have never spoken to Bobrisky. I do not know him at all. The allegation was that he spoke to my son Folarin," Falana said, recounting how Bobrisky once contacted his son to request ₦3 million for special prison accommodations. Falana emphasized that his son declined the request and warned Bobrisky against trying to involve him in any bribery attempts.

Falana added that the voice note was part of a broader attempt to defame him and asserted that civil action would be taken if the apology and retraction were not forthcoming.

October 4, 2024 Rivers Crisis: Fubara Confronts RSEIC Office Following Police Attempted Takeover

Rivers Crisis: Fubara Confronts RSEIC Office Following Police Attempted Takeover

Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, thwarted an early morning attempt by the Nigerian Police, led by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Operations), to take control of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) on Friday at around 1 AM.

A video obtained by Channels Television shows policemen allegedly trying to scale the gates and access the strong room of the commission, purportedly to seize sensitive electoral materials intended for Saturday’s local government election in the state.

Upon alert from vigilant security personnel, the commission's senior officers and government authorities informed the governor of the situation. Fubara, accompanied by top officials, lawmakers, political stakeholders, and other leaders, quickly arrived at the RSIEC office.

In the video, voices can be heard shouting, “Move this thing! Illegal police! Illegal police! Thief! Thief!” while some of Fubara's supporters confronted the vehicles stationed outside the commission's office, some of which were carrying policemen.

Currently, the Chief of Staff, the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, members of the State and National Assembly, and other stakeholders are stationed at the RSIEC office to ensure that the police, who arrived in two trucks and two Hilux vehicles, do not return, ensuring that the election proceeds as scheduled.

This development follows a statement by the Rivers State Police Command on Wednesday, in which spokesperson SP Grace Iringe-Koko confirmed receiving a restraining order that prevents the police from providing security during the October 5 local government elections.

Governor Fubara previously expressed disappointment that his party, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), would not participate in the election. He stressed that the election must proceed as scheduled to comply with the Federal Government's three-month deadline to implement the Supreme Court ruling on local government autonomy.

October 3, 2024 Premier League Announces Arteta, Maresca, and Others as Manager of the Month Nominees

Premier League Announces Arteta, Maresca, and Others as Manager of the Month Nominees

The Premier League on Thursday revealed the nominees for the September Manager of the Month award, highlighting some of the league’s standout tacticians.

Arsenal's Mikel Arteta leads the pack after steering his team through an unbeaten run. Aston Villa's Unai Emery is also in contention, having turned his side into serious contenders with a series of commanding performances.

Chelsea's Enzo Maresca earned a spot on the list, receiving praise for his impact at Stamford Bridge as the Blues show steady improvement under his leadership.

Additionally, Fulham's Marco Silva has kept his team competitive with solid results, while Liverpool's Arne Slot has played a key role in the Reds' resurgence, pushing for top honors in the league.

Each nominee has been instrumental in their club’s recent success, making the race for September's Manager of the Month highly anticipated. Fans and analysts alike are eager to see who will claim the prestigious award.

October 3, 2024 Court Prohibits VIO from Stopping and Impounding Vehicles

Court Prohibits VIO from Stopping and Impounding Vehicles

Justice Evelyn Maha of the Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an order preventing the Directorate of Road Traffic Services (commonly known as the Vehicle Inspection Office, VIO) from stopping, impounding, or confiscating vehicles. The court also barred the agency from imposing fines on motorists.

The judgment, delivered on October 2, followed a suit filed by human rights activist and attorney Abubakar Marshal, who challenged the legality of such actions by the VIO. Justice Maha agreed with the applicant’s argument that there is no legal basis for the VIO to carry out these activities, declaring them wrongful, oppressive, and unlawful.

In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1695/2023, Marshal sued several respondents, including the Directorate of Road Traffic Services and the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory. He sought a court declaration that the VIO's actions violated motorists' fundamental rights to fair hearing, freedom of movement, and presumption of innocence, citing sections of the Nigerian Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

The court granted a restraining order against the respondents, prohibiting them and their agents from impounding vehicles or imposing fines. Additionally, a perpetual injunction was issued to safeguard Nigerians' rights to freedom of movement, presumption of innocence, and property ownership, ensuring that the VIO could no longer infringe on these rights without legal justification.

Watch Live

x
PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com
X